Hello Carsten, On Mon, Jan 26 2004, 0:52:14 you wrote:
>> That sounds wrong. CT> Huh? This is the way good mail clients work. It is not wrong at all. It _is_ wrong. See my other messages in this thread, where I clearly demonstrate that 1) there is actually _nothing_ in RFC2045 preventing a MUA from encoding low ASCII characters in whatever encoding and forcing it to US-ASCII, and 2) failure to do that on MUA's part results in various inconveniences for some users, and those inconveniences are actually _not_ forced by RFC compliance. That's why I describe this as "maybe wrong understanding of RFCs" on behalf of MUAs' authors (not only those of The Bat!, seems to be). Regards, Maksym. -- Maksym Kozub, MK881-UANIC mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
