Hello MAU! On Wednesday, February 04, 2004, 4:06 PM, you wrote:
AM>> Now, can we please stop this nitpicking about how members choose to word AM>> introductions to their replies. M> Sorry Allie, I agreed on stopping this but I forgot something about M> "nitpicking". M> This is from your MOD template about cut mark and used in this same M> thread by Marck: <snip> M> At least three lines of text? Being courteous to other readers? Hmmmm. Oh, come on, Miguel! Sit down with me and have a cup of coffee. The cut-mark is one of the distinctive and wonderful features of this list, and I am really glad the moderators enforce it. (Even though mine gets messed up, sometimes.) However, I'm sorry that I butted into the thread originally. The anonymous "tb" is determined not to use one. Not my affair. So, I thought I'd be courteous and welcome him, in case he should be the newcomer I had assumed him to be. And, instead, I got jumped on for not using a convention that another fellow-subscriber preferred, and then the whole thing veered off onto *his* conventions!! Really, this truly ought to be on tbot, IMHO, and I do wish you'd subscribe there. *And*--to complicate matters, I did feel so much as if you'd come to my defense, criticizing the criticizer! All of us need more sleep? (Picking up on the tbbeta banter here.) :) I'll say this, you and Allie are both among my heroes, and I can't bear to see you bickering over these small points. Long live the cut-mark! Long live Miguel, Allie, Leif, and Marck. Actually, I had taken a vow to stay out of this thread, further, but you are irresistible. :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
