Hello MAU, On Wed, 12 May 2004 20:36:46 +0200 GMT (13/05/2004, 01:36 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote:
>> IIRC the RFC says that a Reply-To header is only necessary when that >> address is different from the From address, so I don't know what TB's >> default is all about. M> Considers the zillions of e-mail users world-wide. What percentage would M> you say the even know that RFCs exist? :) It doesn't matter, as the user is not involved. If there is no Reply-To, the email client should send a reply to the From address; if there is a Reply-To, the reply should go to that. Why TB inserts an unnessary Reply-To is beyond me, even though it doesn't cause any harm. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Eine Ratte schwaermt der anderen vor: 'Ach ja, diese Lerngesetze sind schon toll! Jedes Mal wenn ich diesen Hebel druecke, muss mir der Weisskittel Futter geben!' Message reply created with The Bat! 2.10.01 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 256MB RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
