Hello Urban! On Wednesday, April 28, 2004, 5:51 PM, you wrote:
TF>> My filter continues to work. TF>> Reply-To:.*TBUDL TF>> present in kludges TF>> regex on. U> My filter didn't U> Reply-to:.*tbudl\@ U> present in kludges U> regex on. U> so I stole yours. :) What's your opinion of Jonathan's caution on this shorter string? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Presently I'm staying with two tbudl filters, one with the string of the changed Reply to: and one with the string of the old Reply to: ,to which tbudl is now reverted. For me, that will work, however inelegant, because I have plenty of room and a fast Bat. I can just keep adding new Rules for tbudl, if we end up with a string of strings. (Apologies to Marck, SCNR.) :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 2.00.6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
