Hallo Thomas, On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 02:04:20 +0700GMT (2-7-2004, 21:04 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
RO>> However you're posting garbage. Messages without Message-ID (that's RO>> illegal according to the RFC's), TF> That's not quite correct, IIRC. If a message is sent without a message TF> ID, the receiving MTA will create one. Not the receiving mta, but the first mta. TF> We have had messages on this list for which everyone had a TF> different message ID. Yep, that's because there's a lot of broken (or misconfigured) software on the web. And when somebody's writing with TB then he's either deliberately messing things up or he doesn't realise what he has done. TF> Your message didn't thread, and I haven't gone through all messages in TF> TBUDL yet, but I think I've got another mid for the OP's message than TF> you, and that's why your reply doesn't thread. That was more or less what I wrote, wasn't it? -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
