Hello Thomas, On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 11:48:55 +0700 UTC, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
40 CMG>> I fail to see why TB! should destroy the message-id. TF> 50 "Should"? No, I don't think anybody ever said that. The question is, TF> does it violate the RFC if the MUA doesn't supply the MID. The answer TF> is: no, but (GOTO 10). If you quote, do it correctly. Here's Roelof's paragraph which I quoted and was right before your "50": "Especially when you look at the last paragraph, it's clear that TB should destroy the message-id before sending the message out." Can you see it now? -- Regards, Charles. Using TB! 2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
