On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:55:41 +0700, Thomas Fernandez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:37:40 +0200 GMT (30/09/2004, 23:37 +0700 GMT),
> Spam wrote:
>
> S> I do not agree with you at all that Unicode is just a empty promise.
>
> IMHO Unicode is the future. What Edvinas meant is that *Unicode in TB*
> has been promised for a long time and still isn't there.
So, I send 2 or 3 emails to information request from
TheBat's menu, and I get no response. I publicly ask
about the lack of responses, and then I get something. Go
figure...
About unicode, the response is:
On Tuesday, September 7th, 2004, at 08:47:55 GMT +09:00 (IRKST)
(at the same time
it was 07/09/2004, 02:47:55 my local time), you wrote (at least in part):
W> Specifically, will there be support for unicode in version 3?
It will be added as soon as possible.
WL
--
.
________________________________________________
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
