-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

   ***^\     ."_)~~
 ~( __ _"o   Was another beautiful day, Sat, 2 Oct 2004,
   @  @      at 13:35:34 +0200, when Roelof Otten wrote:

> Hallo Mica,

> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:24:55 +0200GMT (2-10-2004, 0:24 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:

MM>> I think that WilWilWil wanted to say that this number of bytes doesn't
MM>> match the number of bytes when the message body is copied to a text
MM>> editor. True. It seems that in TB few bytes are "hidden". Or that TB
MM>> cannot count correctly. (-: Example: the original message of yours has,
MM>> by TB, 831 byte, but copied in UltraEdit it shows 829.

> That's odd. In my TB it's the other way around.
> TB shows Alexander's message as 829 bytes and EDXOR shows (after a
> copy/paste from the preview 831. A copy/paste from the <F9> screen
> gives me 831 bytes too.

This message of yours TB sees as of 971 byte. My EDXOR shows 969 bytes.
(-:

> This two byte difference is a constant for other messages too.

Here also.

> So I guess TB doesn't count the trailing CRLF.

Why only two bytes then?

- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: <http://pgp.mit.edu/> once just before breakfast
[Earth LOG: 31 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFBXqVa9q62QPd3XuIRAncVAJ9XamWU5XovR2th4lpczSEeCpi7UACePH1V
/T5DJwpzhOyc11PcSrYndLY=
=J88A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to