MM> Hello all, MM> Saturday, July 29, 2006, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
MP>>>> May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? >>> I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more >>> attractive, too. >> Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try >> another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried >> sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the >> start). >> How long have you been using it now? MM> I have used K9 and other external antispams and then used all antispam MM> plugins created for The Bat!, started with BayesIt, then Bayes Filter MM> Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months. MM> And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I MM> have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external MM> application. I can second the positive feedback on AntispamSniper. I've been using it since v1 was announced and bought a license a few weeks later. Few spams get by it and even fewer false positives. I tried the BayesIt and Bayes Filter plugin but had problems with both. Prior to switching to The Bat earlier this year I used K9 with about 98.5% and AntiSpamSniper seems to be running about the same, My 2 cents worth. Larry -- TheBat! 3.80.06 Windows XP ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
