On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:19:43 +0700, Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I confirm this is the case over here, in the Despatcher. But this is >exactly what Grumpy wants, so I am confused why they are sorted at >random in his case. Hi, So am I - if the messages are meant to be assigned a number based on the time they were received, I can't work out why message #1 is from 17 December, message #2 is from 13 December, MEssage #3 is from 20 December etc. Ok, I can see there is an order to the message number in that it goes from 1 to 100 or whatever, but I can't see any relationship between the message date and the number it gets assigned! -- Regards, GG ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
