Hello Mark, M>> I think that would be what people would expect. As I say in another M>> message I don't get much TNEF email lately (I have trained my M>> correspondents) but they used to use rich text showing quoted text in M>> red (with no >>>, etc.) and their own text in blue. If you can't see the M>> colours, it is difficult to tell which text is quoted and which not.
<snipped quite a bit> > It was only much later that I saw the added numbers. And looking at that > winmail.dat with winmail opener, I now see that he wrote those number in red. > > Needless to say I would have seen his replies much earlier if I would have > looked at it with winmail opener. > > Even if TB! would keep on showing the text version only, I now know that, to > make sure I do not oversee possible replies, I'd better open the winmail.dat > with winmail opener... I know exactly what you mean and believe that, to avoid this type of misunderstandings, TB should display TNEF email with all the Rich Text attributes (colour mainly) or not display them at all. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.14 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.0.0.22 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
