Hello MFPA, On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:45:34 +0100 GMT (23/May/10, 5:45 AM +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote:
>> Server-side is better anyway: No need to download all the spam >> messages. M> And, presumably, no way to rescue messages falsely categorised as M> spam. You presume wrong. I get a daily list of mails that where classified as spam, and a link in each mail which I can click on and "mark the message as not spam". In addition, I can look at the spam folder any time I like and de-spam a message. I would look there if I am expecting a message and haven't received it yet. In most cases, the list of spam messages in the morning is sufficient. The spam clasification is based on Bayesian filters, so it learns. I can also explicitely white-list or black-list email address. So, I have all the comfort a client-side spam solution offers, with the difference that I don't need to download the messages first. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.33.9 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
