The problem is that "Config Bundles" are actually already called config modules. So you are voting for the rename to something else :-)
On Aug 17, 2007, at 7:26 AM, Jason Voegele wrote: > On Friday 17 August 2007 10:22, Steven Harris wrote: >> How else is module used internally? > > We use module to refer to the directories under code/base that > contain all of > the source code, tests, etc. dso-l1, dso-l2, common, etc. etc. > > This is actually quite confusing in the build system, since it is > using the > word 'module' to refer to both the source code modules like dso-l2, > as well > as what we've been calling config bundles. For my own sanity, I > would like > to stay away from 'modules' being the replacement for 'config > bundles'. :-) > > -- > Jason Voegele > Running Windows on a Pentium is like having a brand new Porsche but > only > be able to drive backwards with the handbrake on. > (Unknown source) > _______________________________________________ > tc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
