Seems reasonable to me. Anyone know if there is a reason why it isn't already that way?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tc-dev- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Keim > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [tc-dev] auto-synchronized autlocks > > Currently only read and write autolocks can be auto-synchronized. Does it > not makes sense to allow concurrent and synchronous-write autolocks to > also > be auto-synchronized? > > In addition to: > > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_READ > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_WRITE > > Shouldn't there also be: > > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_SYNCHRONOUS_WRITE > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_CONCURRENT > > Rational: the concept of automatically introducing a monitor is orthogonal > to the type of lock on that monitor. > > _______________________________________________ > tc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
