In general, one thing I've been wondering about: what's the difference between using concurrent locks and using no locking at all?
On 07 Sep 2007, at 02:58, Gary Keim wrote: > Currently only read and write autolocks can be auto-synchronized. > Does it > not makes sense to allow concurrent and synchronous-write autolocks > to also > be auto-synchronized? > > In addition to: > > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_READ > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_WRITE > > Shouldn't there also be: > > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_SYNCHRONOUS_WRITE > ConfigLockLevel.AUTO_SYNCHRONIZED_CONCURRENT > > Rational: the concept of automatically introducing a monitor is > orthogonal > to the type of lock on that monitor. -- Geert Bevin Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org Music and words - http://gbevin.com _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
