Agreed - Juris, can you wait till we have some consensus? Are any of these projects going to move to the forge and out of the main code base completely? If so, I'm not sure that it even matters what they're called right now.
Maybe we don't even need the dso prefix? Why not just config-... ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eugene Kuleshov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:02:47 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago Subject: Re: [tc-dev] new config modules Umm... Should we've discussed it first? :-) The new names you've used have pretty much same issue: dso-excludes-config dso-spring dso-spring-config regards, Eugene Juris Galang wrote: > I'll rename these... > > On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Eugene Kuleshov wrote: > > >> I've noticed several new projects for config modules: >> >> excludes-config >> guimodels-config >> jdk15-preinst-config >> spring-config >> standard-config >> >> because of such naming these projects are shuffled within some other >> projects and not very convenient to deal with, so I'd like to >> suggest to >> rename them to use some common prefix, maybe "dso-config-" or >> "config-": >> >> dso-config-excludes >> dso-config-guimodels >> dso-config-jdk15-preinst >> dso-config-spring >> dso-config-standard >> dso-config-common (for modules-common) >> >> this way all those projects would stick together and will be easy to >> pickup. >> >> regards, >> Eugene >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tc-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > tc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev > _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
