We should check with Taylor on the new name for config modules. I think he said the other day that they would be called integration modules or bundles, can't remember which. If so, maybe integ- would be better.
Before renaming, we should also check whether anyone has in-process changes on these projects that would complicate their merge/commit. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juris Galang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2007 1:00:51 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago Subject: Re: [tc-dev] new config modules I think we should just go ahead and rename them now - even though it hasn't been pulled out and into the forge (yet) - it's a low-impact change and addresses Eugene's pains. Possible prefixes: config- stdcfg- dso-config- I don't really care which one we pick. If we could think of a shorter descriptive prefix, I'd go for it. On Oct 4, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Jason Voegele wrote: > Have we arrived at any sort of consensus on this issue? FWIW, I feel > that either a dso-config- prefix or simply a config- prefix is > preferable to the current -config suffix. I've never been fond of the > clustered- prefix, however. > > On Tuesday 25 September 2007 2:16, Alex Miller wrote: >> Agreed - Juris, can you wait till we have some consensus? >> >> Are any of these projects going to move to the forge and out of the >> main code base completely? If so, I'm not sure that it even matters >> what they're called right now. >> >> Maybe we don't even need the dso prefix? Why not just config-... ? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Eugene Kuleshov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:02:47 PM (GMT-0600) >> America/Chicago Subject: Re: [tc-dev] new config modules >> >> >> Umm... Should we've discussed it first? :-) >> >> The new names you've used have pretty much same issue: >> >> dso-excludes-config >> dso-spring >> dso-spring-config >> >> regards, >> Eugene >> >> Juris Galang wrote: >>> I'll rename these... >>> >>> On Sep 25, 2007, at 1:13 AM, Eugene Kuleshov wrote: >>>> I've noticed several new projects for config modules: >>>> >>>> excludes-config >>>> guimodels-config >>>> jdk15-preinst-config >>>> spring-config >>>> standard-config >>>> >>>> because of such naming these projects are shuffled within some >>>> other projects and not very convenient to deal with, so I'd like >>>> to suggest to >>>> rename them to use some common prefix, maybe "dso-config-" or >>>> "config-": >>>> >>>> dso-config-excludes >>>> dso-config-guimodels >>>> dso-config-jdk15-preinst >>>> dso-config-spring >>>> dso-config-standard >>>> dso-config-common (for modules-common) >>>> >>>> this way all those projects would stick together and will be >>>> easy to pickup. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Eugene >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> tc-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tc-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tc-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tc-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev > > -- > Jason Voegele > Life is a game. Money is how we keep score. > -- Ted Turner > _______________________________________________ > tc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
