Does this mean that we don't need the beanshell I described anymore?

On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Geert Bevin wrote:

> Suppose these should be adapted:
>
> http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/~orion/2006/11/17/ 
> Beanshell+for+java.net.URL
> https://wiki.terracotta.org/confluence/display/wiki/Wicket
>
> I think there's also a list of supported (or unsupported classes)  
> somewhere, that should be updated too.
>
> ... and maybe the integration module Wicket should be updated also?
>
> On 09 Oct 2007, at 18:37, Alex Miller wrote:
>
>> Cool stuff.  Are there any docs that need to be updated on the web  
>> site?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 11:32:38 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
>> Subject: [Tc-commits] gbevin [5866] DEV-258 : Support for  
>> java.net.URL deserialization
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tc-commits mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-commits
>>
>
> --
> Geert Bevin
> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
> Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
> RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
> Music and words - http://gbevin.com
>

_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

Reply via email to