Indeed, it should now just be supported as a literal value. On 10 Oct 2007, at 17:12, Orion Letizi wrote:
> Does this mean that we don't need the beanshell I described anymore? > > On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Geert Bevin wrote: > >> Suppose these should be adapted: >> >> http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/~orion/2006/11/17/ >> Beanshell+for+java.net.URL >> https://wiki.terracotta.org/confluence/display/wiki/Wicket >> >> I think there's also a list of supported (or unsupported classes) >> somewhere, that should be updated too. >> >> ... and maybe the integration module Wicket should be updated also? >> >> On 09 Oct 2007, at 18:37, Alex Miller wrote: >> >>> Cool stuff. Are there any docs that need to be updated on the >>> web site? >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 11:32:38 AM (GMT-0600) America/ >>> Chicago >>> Subject: [Tc-commits] gbevin [5866] DEV-258 : Support for >>> java.net.URL deserialization >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tc-commits mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-commits >>> >> >> -- >> Geert Bevin >> Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org >> Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com >> RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org >> Music and words - http://gbevin.com >> > -- Geert Bevin Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org Music and words - http://gbevin.com _______________________________________________ tc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
