Is there some compelling reason to just not make the L2 as a whole mandate
a 1.5 runtime? It sounds like you were just suggesting that an L2 in
network active/passive should have the runtime requirement.

At the moment, one piece of data here is that the classes for the dso-l2
module are compiled for 1.4 targets in 2.4.x, but in 2.5.x they are for
1.5. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tc-dev-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Saravanan Subbiah
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [tc-dev] [JIRA] Created: (CDV-492) Active / Passive over
> Network issue on 1.4
> 
> Tribes doesnt run and hence we short circuit it in 1.4. We should
> probably change it to fail on startup in anything less than 1.5
> 
> Steven Harris wrote:
> > It does. It runs but is unsupported on 1.4
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steve
> >
> > On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Alex Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I thought our server requires 1.5?
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Terracotta JIRA (on behalf of Taylor Gautier)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:30:34 PM (GMT-0600)
America/Chicago
> >> Subject: [tc-dev] [JIRA] Created: (CDV-492) Active / Passive over
> >> Network issue on 1.4
> >>
> >> Active / Passive over Network issue on 1.4
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>                 Key: CDV-492
> >>                 URL: https://jira.terracotta.org/jira//browse/CDV-492
> >>             Project: Community Development
> >>          Issue Type: Bug
> >>            Reporter: Taylor Gautier
> >>            Assignee: Issue Review Board
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> From the forums:
> >>>
> >> http://forums.terracotta.org/forums/posts/list/465.page
> >>
> >> I have got another problem.
> >> I conficured a terracotta server custer running in active passive-
> >> mode over network. My server machines are linux based.
> >> When using Java 5 everyting works fine, in fact starting the first
> >> node the message I get is the following:
> >>
> >> 2007-10-30 14:38:53,446 INFO - Configuration loaded from the file at
> >> '/opt/tc-config.xml'.
> >> 2007-10-30 14:38:53,496 INFO - Log file: '/var/log/terracotta/server-
> >> logs/terracotta-server.log'.
> >> 2007-10-30 14:38:54,453 INFO - JMX Server started. Authentication
> >> OFF - Available at URL[service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:9520/
> >> jmxrmi]
> >> Oct 30, 2007 2:38:55 PM
> >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReceiverBase bind
> >> INFO: Receiver Server Socket bound to:/172.42.1.151:9530
> >> 2007-10-30 14:39:00,880 INFO - Becoming State[ ACTIVE-COORDINATOR ]
> >> 2007-10-30 14:39:00,985 INFO - Terracotta Server has started up as
> >> ACTIVE node on port 9510 successfully, and is now ready for work.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, using java 1.4. Both nodes come up as active.
> >>
> >> The message I get stating the first node is the following:
> >>
> >> 2007-10-30 14:43:48,153 INFO - Configuration loaded from the file at
> >> '/opt/tc-config.xml'.
> >> 2007-10-30 14:43:48,211 INFO - Log file: '/var/log/terracotta/server-
> >> logs/terracotta-server.log'.
> >> 2007-10-30 14:43:49,836 INFO - JMX Server started. Authentication
> >> OFF - Available at URL[service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:9520/
> >> jmxrmi]
> >> 2007-10-30 14:43:56,996 INFO - Becoming State[ ACTIVE-COORDINATOR ]
> >> 2007-10-30 14:43:57,151 INFO - Terracotta Server has started up as
> >> ACTIVE node on port 9510 successfully, and is now ready for work.
> >>
> >> Note that the message:
> >>
> >> Oct 30, 2007 2:38:55 PM
> >> org.apache.catalina.tribes.transport.ReceiverBase bind
> >> INFO: Receiver Server Socket bound to:/172.42.1.151:9530
> >>
> >> is missing now and trying to execute the command:
> >>
> >> netstat -na
> >>
> >> no socket appears to be listenining on the port 9530, so the packet
> >> sent by other node is rejected (I saw that sniffing packet on the
> >> other node).
> >> Of course no problem for me using java 1.5, but how come terracotta
> >> server cluster doesn't work proberly with java 1.4?
> >>
> >> The distribution I've used is Red hat enterprise 3, but I've got the
> >> same problem even using CentOS final 4.3.
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >> -
> >> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> >> administrators:
> https://jira.terracotta.org/jira//secure/Administrators.jspa
> >> -
> >> For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tc-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tc-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > tc-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

_______________________________________________
tc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.terracotta.org/mailman/listinfo/tc-dev

Reply via email to