> In replacement of "acceptance rate", once a friend tried to convince me about > adding some factors as the absolute number of submited/accepted papers and > the number of attendees. Perhaps he is right and acceptance rate just make > sense if we analyze all conference context. Loosely related to your comment, I'd definitely like to see something like the below table, maintained by the crypto and security community, also for networking conferences.
http://icsd.i2r.a-star.edu.sg/staff/jianying/conference-ranking.html True, senior persons here around can easily "guess" what are the events which would be at the top according to these criteria (and hence where it is really worth to submit your best work), but having it black on white would be quite instructive (esp. if we further account for attendees per track). _______________________________________________ IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. Tccc@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
