After seeing Alex d'Arte talk at Criativa 08, the first thing that I  
thought about his speech, which publicity should be pulled instead of  
pushed and how entertainment is the key, was that the media (there)  
was all wrong. Heck! The media in Portugal is wrong. They're doing the  
wrong way and against their real audience. If fact, on long run,  
they'll be loosing their audience, as today kids become tomorrow grown  
ups.

The media today employs a lot of people, it's full of desire for  
advertisers and this market moves a lot of money, lot of mouths and  
jaguars do feed. So saying that the internet will kill the tv star, is  
to say that someone is going postal. That will never happen. TV is a  
institution and therefor serves a lot of markets and people. TV in  
some cases educates and it's the only way to people get informed and  
entertained. Yet, it's a push world. There's no interaction with the  
user. Media people dump information down the tube, people at home see  
it. Sure they can zap, they can even turn off TV, but then again, in  
the following morning they have a feeling of being less educated than  
that neighbor that watched the news, movie or saw that guy how failed  
on some show. That day will be long and in the elevator people don't  
have talk.

Still, it's a push world. We need to see whenever some media people  
scheduled it, for our supposed market needs. But does this need to be  
changed ? Of course! People aren't no longer passive lurkers. They  
want to interact, to talk, to seek more information as they don't see  
TV anymore as the final authority on the world or subjects. They  
stopped being lurkers and become producers. They schedule their own  
programs, they skip ads, turn on whenever they want and watch the news  
from the start, from different stations at the same time, they  
interact and make their own cultural plans, in a world called  
INTERNET. That's the future. The media just realized that too late and  
still they're fooling around with the internet, as hell on earth. Sure  
that's their problem, but people realized that the future is not TDT  
or HDTV. It's the experience and the internet beats the crap out of it.

We see that on the DVD series that are sold everyday, on the news  
sources that people read from the internet, the music that they don't  
saw on MTV anymore, the inexistent of tv shows for kids on weekend  
mornings, the lack and unprepared journalists that do any kind of  
subjects, with no in depth analysis.

Sure the future is experience and internet, sure is on demand but  
where can the actual media help ? Will it have their space? I think  
so, but not on the actual concept. They need to shift to became the  
mentors and tube for the prosumer - the producer consumer -, that's  
were they can fit in. Helping these amateurs producing for consumers,  
not breaking the cycle, but rather taking part of it as mentor, as the  
people that know more than the average user and has the means for  
amateurs that are willing to produce to their own niche or market.  
Becoming a platform and not a product or a service. That's were I  
think that media should be.

So, today an article pop on my feed. It's called "Progressive Internet  
Entrepreneurs", by Jeffrey Chester, which is executive director of the  
Center for Digital Democracy. He talks about the big digital media and  
mergers and how they backup the actual media and system. He urges  
people, as he calls digital natives, to shift and change this to a  
better "communitainment", where the entertainment is made by the  
community. It's a "a progressive media action plan" : 
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080616/chester/print

As someone said; "it's not the end that counts anymore, it's the  
medium".

//VD
_______________________________________________
tce mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.paradigma.pt/mailman/listinfo/tce

Responder a