Hi, As you may know, ptkdb uses perl/Tk.
I - personally - moved to perl+Tcl/tk out from perl/Tk (many years ago) and never return back. For usage of debugger - I adopted ptkdb for perl+Tcl/Tk Now - if you're using perl/Tk - then do use ptkdb, if you're using perl+Tcl/Tk - then do use tkdb. During adoption, I greatly reduced the size of debugger, greatly improved (now it can debug autogenerated script of size 150k lines, for example)) Also I throwed away obsoleted technologies in ptkdb, but then I left it unfinished, in the middle. Maybe someday the work will be finished. maybe not. Please let us know if you have actual interest in it. Regards, Vadim. ________________________________ From: Persico, Matthew [mailto:mpers...@knight.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:06 PM To: 'aep...@users.sourceforge.net'; 'nob...@home.net'; 'v...@cpan.org' Subject: ptkdb vs tkdb Gentlemen, After a few years of being off in the wilderness of other languages I am returning to Perl. When searching for a piece of information about ptkdb, I encountered tkdb, some of whose documentation appears to be lifted right out of the ptkdb page. I also see that the tkdb page and AEP listed as an author. So, what’s the deal? Is tkdb the anointed successor to ptkdb? Or a sibling? Thanks, Matthew Persico, Vice President T 201 963 2525 mpers...@knight.com | www.knight.com [cid:078162611@17012013-113B] Knight Capital Americas LLC 545 Washington Blvd. | Jersey City, NJ 07310 Please visit our website for important disclaimers/disclosures regarding Knight’s products and services: http://www.knight.com/KnightEmailDisclaimer.html
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
