> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Starr
> 
> I never number tables or figures, thus I never need either a 
> LOT or LOF.


I'm glad to find out I'm not the only one who doesn't number figures. I very 
rarely refer to figures except in the text immediately preceding them, so I 
don't see a need to give them numbers.

Bob
"Love people. Use things. Not vice-versa." -- Kelly Rothaus


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brierley, Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:22 PM
> Subject: [TCP] numbering tables and figures
> 
> > What is your opinion on this, and why?
> >
> > Number tables and figures using the same series, identify both as
> > figures.
> >
> > Thus:
> >
> > Figure 1
> > Figure 2
> > Figure 3
> > Figure 4
> > Figure 5
> > Figure 6
> >
> > Rather than
> >
> > Figure 1
> > Table 1
> > Figure 2
> > Figure 3
> > Table 2
> > Figure 4
> >
> > And then, combining the LOF and LOT into one LOF.

______________________________________________

Are you a Help Authoring Trainer or Consultant? Let clients find you at 
www.HAT.Matrix.com, the searchable HAT database based on Char James-Tanny's HAT 
Comparison Matrix. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details.

Interested in Interactive 3D Documentation? Get the scoop at 
http://www.doc-u-motion.com -- your 3D documentation community.
_______________________________________________

Technical Communication Professionals

Post a message to the list: email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe, unsubscribe, archives, account options, list info: 
http://techcommpros.com/mailman/listinfo/tcp_techcommpros.com
Subscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Need help? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Get the TCP whole experience! http://www.techcommpros.com

Reply via email to