On Dec 11, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Jefferson Ogata wrote:
I agree. For one thing, another MIME type might eventually exist for
filter specifications. It is not sufficient to describe a capture
file as simply "pcap".
But what I think is missing is a version number. Given the talk in
recent years about implementing the next version, I think the type
should be application/pcap-capture-v1.
Given that the next version
1) is extensible, so, with any luck, it should be a long while before
we need to come up with a next version after that;
2) is called "pcap-NG", so "application/pcap-ng-capture" or something
such as that could be its media type;
3) there's no number in the file that's being bumped from 1 to 2 by
pcap-ng (there is a major and minor version number in pcap format, but
all versions would be "application/pcap-capture", and there's a major
and minor version number in pcap-ng format, but that's in the section
header block, and there could be multiple sections with different
versions - and they'd all be "application/pcap-ng-capture" in any case);
I don't see any need for "-v1" in the media type.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
