On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:38:43AM +0000, Jefferson Ogata wrote:
> But what I think is missing is a version number. Given the talk in
> recent years about implementing the next version, I think the type
> should be application/pcap-capture-v1.
I agree with Guy, the version is not necesary. At most I could imagine
a version parameter ("Content-Type: application/pcap-capture; version=1")
but even that is not necesary: the version will surely be unambiguously
distinguishable by examining the beginning of the file (magic number).
-Phil
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
