On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:20:40 +0000 Denis Ovsienko <de...@ovsienko.info> wrote:
> This makes SLL2 quite close to sockaddr_ll (except the the order of > fields and the sll_family field, which is told to be equal to > AF_PACKET in this case). In other words, it looks sufficiently good > on paper to proceed with the implementation. Ah; I wasn't intentionally making the order different to the underlying address struct. Does that matter? I'm happy to amend it if anyone thinks that's an issue, otherwise we'll just go with it. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leon...@leonerd.org.uk http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
