--- Begin Message ---
> On 25. Jan 2023, at 21:33, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
>
> On 25. Jan 2023, at 17:42, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I am not sure that pcap*NG* is so incredibly established that we can't change
>> it. I just hate "Next Generation" for anything, particularly when time
>> moves on.
>> What about if we kept N and G, but changed what they meant?
>
> (SenML started as an XML vocabulary, but now is mostly JSON and CBOR — so we
> turned the “ML” into “Measurement Lists”.
> Which is somewhat bizarre, but keeps the acronym.
> For retronyming PCAPNG, what is central to PCAPNG that would explain the P,
> N, and G?)
pcap, now generalized?
Best regards
Michael
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> ops...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
