On Apr 15, 2024, at 3:47 PM, Ravi chandra <particlere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am planning to create an ieee 802.11 packet RadioTap parsing > code/library [offlines processing of pcap-ng files. Decoding each and > every field and write it to a .csv file]. If that's all you're doing, is there some reason why you don't just use TShark and do tshark -T fields -E separator=, -E quote=d -e {radiotap field} -e {another radiotap field} ... > Meanwhile, before asking [did my homework] of going through source > code and found the following. > > [1] Compared to the Wireshark library, RadioTap library files By "Radiotap library files" do you mean this library: https://github.com/radiotap/radiotap-library > are NOT updated in the radiotap-library. What do you mean by "NOT updated"? Do you mean that the recent commits haven't significantly changed the library? If so, maybe there's not much that needs changing. > [2] I see RadioTap headers/files/parsing functions have additional > arguments [which are specific to wireshark]. In other words, there is > NO direct way to call RadioTap headers easily to integrate with > libpcap_open_offline and pcap_next. Note that tcpdump has its own code to parse radiotap headers, and that code doesn't use the Radiotap library. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s