On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:21:46PM +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote: > I didn't try tcpdump v3.7, since I had not found any words about this > bug in changelog.
There is no guarantee that all bugs will show up in the changelog; the changelog is built from the CVS logs - by hand, I think - and the checkin for a change that I suspect would fix that problem is revision 1.51 date: 2001/06/01 03:49:02; author: itojun; state: Exp; lines: +147 -170 cleanup. do not use recurse for nd option priting. which doesn't say anything about that particular bug. I.e., the proper strategy is "try 3.7", not "check to see if the bug is mentioned in the changelog and, if it is, try 3.7, otherwise assume that the bug isn't fixed", as there's no guarantee that the absence of a note in the changelog means it isn't fixed. - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
