Hello, Guy!

On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Guy Harris wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:21:46PM +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
> > I didn't try tcpdump v3.7, since I had not found any words about this
> > bug in changelog.
>
> There is no guarantee that all bugs will show up in the changelog; the
> changelog is built from the CVS logs - by hand, I think - and the
> checkin for a change that I suspect would fix that problem is
>
>   revision 1.51
>   date: 2001/06/01 03:49:02;  author: itojun;  state: Exp;  lines: +147 -170
>   cleanup.  do not use recurse for nd option priting.
>
> which doesn't say anything about that particular bug.
>
> I.e., the proper strategy is "try 3.7", not "check to see if the bug is
> mentioned in the changelog and, if it is, try 3.7, otherwise assume that
> the bug isn't fixed", as there's no guarantee that the absence of a note
> in the changelog means it isn't fixed.

Thanks for your advise.
I've tried v3.7 and it works fine for me.


...Bye..Dmitry.

-
This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe

Reply via email to