Hello, Guy! On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:21:46PM +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote: > > I didn't try tcpdump v3.7, since I had not found any words about this > > bug in changelog. > > There is no guarantee that all bugs will show up in the changelog; the > changelog is built from the CVS logs - by hand, I think - and the > checkin for a change that I suspect would fix that problem is > > revision 1.51 > date: 2001/06/01 03:49:02; author: itojun; state: Exp; lines: +147 -170 > cleanup. do not use recurse for nd option priting. > > which doesn't say anything about that particular bug. > > I.e., the proper strategy is "try 3.7", not "check to see if the bug is > mentioned in the changelog and, if it is, try 3.7, otherwise assume that > the bug isn't fixed", as there's no guarantee that the absence of a note > in the changelog means it isn't fixed. Thanks for your advise. I've tried v3.7 and it works fine for me. ...Bye..Dmitry. - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
