> The tcpdump.org ones should probably treat DLT_HDLC as equivalent to
> DLT_C_HDLC (the latter is what BSD/OS called it; libpcap 0.5 called it
> DLT_CHDLC, and I'm assuming, perhaps incorrectly that they're the same,
> i.e. that the link header is a Cisco HDLC header as described in
> section 4.3.1 of RFC 1547 - itojun picked up the tcpdump.org
> "print-chdlc.c", so it sounds as if that's the case).
Note that there is a somewhat better description of Cisco HDLC available
in an old message from Bill Westfield, saved for posterity at
http://www.nethelp.no/net/cisco-hdlc.txt
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at
http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html
To unsubscribe use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe
