On 7/28/2014 1:38 AM, Zimmermann, Alexander wrote:
Hi,
Am 28.07.2014 um 08:57 schrieb marcelo bagnulo braun <[email protected]>:
Hi,
As we discussed in the meeting, we should try to make some design decisions for
TCPINC.
One of them is whether to protect or not the TCP header.
I would like to start the discussion on this topic. Arguments on one way or the
other?
if folks want to protect the TCP header, I don’t see a (straightforward) way on
how we can
use todays TOE. No TOE is a NO-GO for (at least) data center environments.
TOE doesn't replace the OS TCP, or the fact that the OS TCP is in
control of the offload support. For any TCP modification, either the TOE
supports that modification with an extended interface to the OS or not;
if not, then the OS can't use the TOE for that connection.
None of this is new or specific to TCPINC.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
