Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > I raised this issue during the meeting, notably that we need to decide to > what extent we will support middlebox participation. > > It's clear we need to support simple NATs....
To what extent, if any, does IPv6 change this? Can we drop the NAT support requirement since with the larger address space NAT becomes unnecessary? If not, which of the four translations -- 4-to-4, 4-to-6, 6-to-4, 6-to-6 -- should be supported? Or is that irrelevant since we are at a higher level? My understanding is that v6 requires IPsec on every node. Can we use that? How? _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
