On 30 July 2014 11:29, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote: > We know that middleboxes exist; what we won't know without more > measurements is what sort of damage they will inflict on adopters of any > of the proposed forms of tcpinc.
Google did some research on this from an HTTP perspective when researching SPDY. That indicated that TCP over port 80 that doesn't look like HTTP fails a remarkably large proportion of the time. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg05593.html Here are the numbers: HTTP (port 80) 67% HTTP (port 61985) 86% HTTPS (port 443) 95% We were told in the last HTTPBIS meeting by someone who has run a more recent experiment that these have not improved since that experiment was run and that they may have even degraded a little. I think that this sort of information is highly relevant in this context. _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
