On 8/1/2014 10:33 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
On 8/1/2014 10:20 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote:
If the sole goal is anti-monitoring, we have what we need.
See the Opportunistic Security draft.
Actually, we don't need any mods to any protocols.
PS - to be more clear:
- we do not need a new name for this
- we do not need a new definition for this
- we do not need a new protocol for this
If "THIS" == anti-monitoring.
If "THIS" >= anti-monitoring, there's work to be done, but why hold up
an existing solution that's easy to deploy?
Joe
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
