On 1/08/2014 18:37 pm, Joe Touch wrote: ... > If "THIS" == anti-monitoring. > > If "THIS" >= anti-monitoring, there's work to be done, but why hold up > an existing solution that's easy to deploy?
I'd agree. If there's an existing solution to getting TCP protected, I'd say go for it. Now. Why waste time on discussing it? It's much easier to roll that out a small v0 quickly and then start preparing for a larger v1 based on experience, needs that were deferred, and needs discovered as time goes on. (as an aside, by "existing solution" do you mean tcpcrypt?) elsewhere: > If the IETF wants to provide a service to the community, > generate and maintain those certs for free. Ug. If IETF starts a war with the CAs, it'll not even make it to the NSA battlefield.... iang _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
