Eric Rescorla writes: > I'm not concerned about the level of effort; I'm concerned about having > multiple normative references for the same protocol.
My minimal draft says in abstract: This document does not update or modify RFC 7296, but provides more compact description of the minimal version of the protocol. If this document and RFC 7296 conflicts then RFC 7296 is the authoritative description. And actually my minimal draft has not been published as RFC, but it has already been useful to make people to understand how IKEv2 can be used on the IoT devices or other cases where minimal implementation is needed. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal/ -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
