|
Hi Folks Please allow me to jump in with two thoughts. They may
be incorrect and if so, I apologize up front... First, we must always, always, remind ourselves that filmmakers
are not sociologists, and are not creating their works for us. Thus, we cannot
simply assign the work and assume students will see what we see. I enjoyed
When we teach minority-majority relations, we
generally find it useful to think in terms of “ideal types.” We assert
prejudice and discrimination are two separate, but sometimes related, issues. In
this context, the assumption that acts of discrimination (in this case, willfully
hurting others physically) derive from and are caused by prejudicial beliefs,
assumes that all prejudgments are fundamentally the same, and ultimately must lead
to directly to violence. And to suggest that all prejudgments generally will lead
to a common act (e.g., violence) is equally, an oversimplification. At the very
least, there must be intervening variables associated with socialization, that determine
which prejudicial people will be compelled to translate that prejudgment into a
moral justification toward physical aggression. The decision to violate societal
norms through violence has been, I believe, associated with the presence of an
authoritarian personality type. Which suggests the it is the personality type
that predicts the behavior, and the personality type is associated with
prejudice. But I could be wrong, and probably am. I do not study this sort of
social psychology. Nonetheless, I would suggest it is an
oversimplification that ignores the complexity of human behavior, and the
social conditions that can trigger maladaptive behaviors (e.g., violence). I
would suggest “a fear of or discomfort with homosexuality”
(prejudice) should be viewed as different from “manifest, powerful
actions against homosexuals.” We all fear something, but that does not
cause us to act. I fear corporate actors, but do not think to commit acts of
violence against them. Sexism is often a separate phenomenon from domestic
violence. Sexism is a belief that there are two gender orientations, that those
two are complementary, and that one is better at accomplishing some tasks,
while the other better at other tasks, etc. While the sexism can be related to
domestic violence superficially, the two are not always directly and irrevocably
related (indeed, I would suggest they are not necessarily, causally related). Traditional
orientations toward marriage and dating relations do not cause domestic
violence or date rate. Date rape is about power issues associated with gender expectations,
but the expectations themselves are non-normative in that they are premised upon
submission and oppression, not mutually exclusive but complementary role
relations. Similarly, violence against homosexuals should not be
assumed to be primarily about some fear, but instead, about a desire to use
power to create a social order that itself, is non-normative. When African
Americans were lynched, the people doing the lynching did not fear Black
people. They feared changes in the social order. The violence was about
something else, not against the individual victims or something the victim did.
The presumed action on the part of the victim was tangential to the real issue.
Violence against homosexuals is similar, I suspect. Peace to all Robert Robert J. Hironimus-Wendt, Ph.D. "It doesn't matter how strong your opinions are.
If you don't use your power for positive
change, you are indeed part of the problem, helping to keep
things the way they
are." -Coretta Scott King --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Teaching Sociology" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/teachsoc -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Robert Greene
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Jack Estes
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Melanie E. L. Bush
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Tina Deshotels
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? chris salituro
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Melanie E. L. Bush
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Del Thomas Ph D
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Del Thomas Ph D
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash/ ... Sarah Murray
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash/ ... Robert Hironimus-Wendt
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash/ ... Del Thomas Ph D
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Sarah Murray
- TEACHSOC: Re: Crash? Robert Greene
