On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 23:47 -0800, Erik Moeller wrote: > I propose a "Roadmap" project in Phabricator. Tasks in this project > would be typically epics with rough anticipated calendar-level > delivery dates and clear, understandable task descriptions.
> Tasks would be arranged on a Phabricator workboard like so: > February 2015: Features > February 2015: Platform > February 2015: Apps If tasks are really "typically epics", there's an existing project with an unused workboard: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/epic/ Is there a good enough reason to not use that workboard (plus keeping epics that are way too "epic" in the Backlog column)? How many Roadmap items will *not* be epics? Having another project "Roadmap" with >50% of its tasks being already part of the "Epic" project sounds like potential duplication. Plus keeping track of epics might be one of Wikimedia's problems and I don't think that currently anyone regularly looks at the list of open "Epic" tasks anyway. I'm happy to be proven wrong. andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
