On 06/08/2015 06:35 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
Le 08/06/2015 10:51, Quim Gil a écrit :
Er, sorry, the previous email just left my mailbox too fast.
The proposal below has a related Phabricator
task: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101686
https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Health_check_survey_results/FY2014-15_Q3
indicates a growing concern about code review. Our code review queues
keep growing, I'd say still faster than our concerns, and this trend can
only lead to some variation of *collapse*.
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/gerrit_review_queue.html shows these
monthly snapshots of open chagesets waiting for review (-1 and work in
progress are not counted):
May 2013: 250
May 2014: 1033
May 2015: 1549
<snip>
Hello,
When I look at the korma page, the two first pages are for MediaWiki
extensions that have been abandoned ages ago.
Yes. I didn't verify the "abandoned" part, but at most three of the
first 10 in 'Ranking of repositories' are WMF-deployed.
For future reference, the three are Gerrit, stud, some Android app
called 'translate' which *maybe* WMF is still maintaining but I don't
think so).
The first 10 are SemanticDrilldown, MsUpload, ExternalArticles, gerrit,
SVGEdit, Configure, Debian packaging for stud, Lingo, SocialProfile,
'translate'.
These metrics would be far more meaningful if they were separated into
WMF-deployed software and non-WMF deployed.
Matt Flaschen
_______________________________________________
teampractices mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
