I think, for the most part, we do have a mantra of "everyone is remote." However, there are times when certain facilitation methods call for physical participation, physical charts, etc. The latest meeting had ~10 folks around the table, and one or two remote (simply because they could not make it). I hear the remote love, but I'd still like to find a tool to fit the process, if possible.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > The way the WMF engineering team solved it is that all members are >> attending the meeting remotely. Despite 3 out of 7 members are based in >> SF, albeit frequently working remotely. That might sound a bit extreme >> though. >> > > I had thought about that in the past, but seeing it in this thread really > resonated with me. For meetings with a mix of SF and remote folks, I am > starting to think that it would be better for all the SF folks to scatter > and use individual computers to join the hangout. It would avoid > cross-table talk, and would put the facilitator in a position to have equal > access to all participants. It would also avoid risk of conference room > echo. > > It is extreme, and probably wouldn't be feasible much of the time. But it > does have appeal, and I might look for opportunities to experiment with it. > At a minimum, I'll probably try harder to use my own laptop rather than > conference room A/V when I end up being the only SF participant in a > meeting. > > Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > teampractices mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices > >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
