I tested this on a willing Team Practices Group, and got a lot of good feedback. I populated the github issues page with a slew of user stories. :)
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Sam Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say is that I found myself wanting to immediately respond to a > question and I wasn't sure of the protocol. However, I suspect that this > was heavily influenced by the fact that I was in the meeting room – I'm > usually a face on the big green – and I could see the stack of people > waiting to talk. > > It's been great trying out the tool and I'm looking forward to using it > again. > > -Sam > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Default volume should be 5% now, which works fine in meeting rooms, you >> can barely hear it. >> >> We found very useful to keep the stack window on the big screen resized >> side by side with the big hangouts window to give visibility to the stack. >> >> Even the members of the room used it to wait for a turn, it was pretty >> useful! >> On Jan 13, 2016 17:14, "Max Binder" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yea, I think the best use of sound would be something that the >>> facilitator can hear, but not necessarily everyone. And maybe simply a >>> nicer sound. :) >>> >>> I'll populate the github page! >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Adam, we talked about this and it seems like showing some kind of stats >>>> with how many times the attendants have been in the room would help seeing >>>> who has participated more and who less. Would that be reasonable? >>>> >>>> We've tried it out today in a long meeting and it was definitely >>>> helpful (i monitored the queue, and it helped people queue for talking >>>> without disrupting the current conversation). >>>> >>>> We also found that the sounds are pretty disruptive, so we've added a >>>> mute button so that we can show it on the meeting screen and in remotes >>>> that are talking without bothering everyone. I want to get around to >>>> lowering the volume of the sounds, or disabling them by default. They don't >>>> seem as useful as we anticipated. >>>> >>>> If you find issues or want to request changes, go to >>>> https://github.com/joakin/stack/issues >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>>> On Jan 11 2016, at 12:41 pm, Kristen Lans <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Very cool Joaquin! I can't wait to try it. >>>>> >>>>> FYI, here's a link to a short description of the facilitation >>>>> technique of "stacking" from the group I learned it from, Community at >>>>> Work: http://tinyurl.com/hv5ufmd >>>>> >>>>> KL >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Max Binder <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, Joaquin! >>>>> >>>>> I can't wait to test it in a real meeting. Maybe I'll use TPG as >>>>> guinea pigs... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Joaquin Oltra Hernandez < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I've worked on this during the hackathon, and after chatting with Max >>>>> it has the required functionality to work: >>>>> >>>>> http://stack.wmflabs.org >>>>> >>>>> Features: >>>>> * create named rooms (shareable URL) >>>>> * add yourself to the queue (remembers name) >>>>> * one person can add multiple people >>>>> * can pop from the stack (needs human agreement on who will be the >>>>> popper) >>>>> * plays sound when somebody is added to queue >>>>> * after 5 minutes of stale queue plays warning sound >>>>> >>>>> It's kind of real-time (1s interval polling to server) and it may >>>>> crash at some point, but it gets the job done for now. It's also not >>>>> really >>>>> secured so a mean user can probably easily crash the server, I'm assuming >>>>> good faith for now. >>>>> >>>>> Open to comments, hope this helps! >>>>> On Sep 22, 2015 08:53, "Dan Garry" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 22 September 2015 at 08:40, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I had thought about that in the past, but seeing it in this thread >>>>> really resonated with me. For meetings with a mix of SF and remote folks, >>>>> I >>>>> am starting to think that it would be better for all the SF folks to >>>>> scatter and use individual computers to join the hangout. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is harder than it seems. It can be quite disruptive to those >>>>> around you to sit at your desk being noisy participating in a hangout, and >>>>> that rules out a large part of the office. I've done this before myself >>>>> from the fifth floor collab space, where there are no permanent desks and >>>>> some semi-private areas, but you cannot guarantee the availability of >>>>> those >>>>> spaces. When I was remote I often wondered why more people didn't do this, >>>>> but when I moved to the office, I started to appreciate the difficulties >>>>> with it. >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dan Garry >>>>> Lead Product Manager, Discovery >>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> teampractices mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> teampractices mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> teampractices mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> teampractices mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> teampractices mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> teampractices mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > teampractices mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices > >
_______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
