Hej, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101686 lists "Prioritization / weak open source culture: more pressure to write new code than to review patches contributed."
Apart from whether that statement is true or not: Does the Team Practices Group encourage regular Gerrit patch backlog grooming? If so, how, and is there any documentation available, or even data which teams perform better or worse? Is there any differentiation between "internal" patches by team members vs. contributed patches? Or is this out of scope for TPG? Thanks a lot! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
