Thanks everybody for the comments! However I'm still curious if this is part of the TPG scope, hence I'd welcome a reply from TPG members.
Thanks, andre On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 14:16 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101686 lists "Prioritization / weak > open source culture: more pressure to write new code than to review > patches contributed." > > Apart from whether that statement is true or not: > Does the Team Practices Group encourage regular Gerrit patch backlog > grooming? If so, how, and is there any documentation available, or even > data which teams perform better or worse? Is there any differentiation > between "internal" patches by team members vs. contributed patches? > Or is this out of scope for TPG? -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
