If the state requires it and you do not do it, then they will withhold their monies,......wait, they're already doing that.
They can't touch us. Scott ________________________________________ From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org [tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of Butch Wilson [bwil...@roe25.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 9:52 AM To: 'Tech-Geeks Mailing List' Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] New E-Rate Revisons However, if the state still requires a tech plan... -----Original Message----- From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org [mailto:tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of JimHays Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 3:10 PM To: Tech-Geeks Mailing List Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] New E-Rate Revisons There are two statements in this that everyone should read: In paragraph 58 "We amend sections 54.504 and 54.508 of our rules to eliminate the E-rate technology plan requirements for all priority one applications." and in paragraph 61 "We find it reasonable to eliminate the technology plan requirement for all priority one service requests, even when the applicant is not subject to a state or local technology plan requirement, and regardless of the amount of the request." That is all I need to see. Looks like we are asking for E-Rate for our ICN connection this year........ Bob Morse wrote: > > The PDF that explains in great detail the new revisions is posted on > USAC's website.just in case you want some light reading. Very > interesting stuff... > > http://www.usac.org/_res/documents/about/pdf/fcc-orders/2010-fcc-orders/FCC- 10-175.pdf > > Bob Morse > > E-Rate Coordinator > > Technology Specialist > > Community Consolidated Schools District 168 > > 708-758-1610 ext. 124 > > Skype: bmorse68 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org | | Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
