If they truly "need" speech to text then Dragon is not expensive. It
is a bargain.
This is a great example of people who are confusing two 4-letter words -
need and want.............
If they "need" it, the price is very reasonable. If they "want" it, it
is a bit expensive.
Kenny, David wrote:
It has been my experience that Dragon is really the only option. Astoundingly,
it's been that way for the last 5-10 years. You'd think some manufacturer
would come into this market to compete with Dragon Naturally Speaking.
I suppose it depends what you want to do with it. I've heard good things about
Kurzweil products for special education. But then... you think *Dragon is
expensive*! Well.. take a look at Kurzweil. <Sly grin>
That said, I haven't looked at any of this software systematically in the last
2-3 years. So maybe the landscape has radically changed since I last looked.
David Kenny
Network Administrator
Belvidere CUSD #100
-----Original Message-----
From: tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org
[mailto:tech-geeks-boun...@tech-geeks.org] On Behalf Of Brian Tobin
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:21 PM
To: tech-geeks@tech-geeks.org
Subject: [tech-geeks] Voice to text
Is there any decent voice to text open source software? Is everyone just
telling their sped dept to pony up for dragon?
Sent from T-Mobile G2 with Google
| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
Pursuant to Illinois’ public records law, this written communication may
constitute a public record which is available to the public and media upon
request. Please be advised that this email communication may be subject to
public disclosure.
| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |
| Subscription info at http://www.tech-geeks.org |