On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:51:45 +0200 Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:55:51PM -0400, Thor Simon wrote: > > Can anyone tell me why, exactly, we shouldn't remove bound AF_LOCAL > > sockets from the filesystem on last close? > > If you want to do that, wouldn't it be easier to just go the Linux route > and move them into a separate (virtual) namespace completely? Could this not pose security risks in certain scenarios? Or would such a namespace also support permissions? Thanks, -- Matt
