On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:51:45PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:55:51PM -0400, Thor Simon wrote: > > Can anyone tell me why, exactly, we shouldn't remove bound AF_LOCAL > > sockets from the filesystem on last close? > > If you want to do that, wouldn't it be easier to just go the Linux route > and move them into a separate (virtual) namespace completely?
Linux does that? I ran this test program on a Linux system and got a socket in the filesystem and the same results. -- Thor Lancelot Simon t...@rek.tjls.com "All of my opinions are consistent, but I cannot present them all at once." -Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On The Social Contract
