On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:54:07 +0000 David Holland <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:33:42PM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote: > > Yet another hack would be to create a sparse ffs image under a tmpfs, > > mounted with quotas via vnd, but evaluating its ideal size might be > > difficult, and you'd have to re-apply quota settings in the script that > > creates the image at boot time... :) > > Using mfs instead of tmpfs is probably a better bet here. mfs brings > in enough of ufs that adding quota support to it shouldn't be > particularly complicated. I was also wondering initially if mfs didn't actually already support quotas because of this similarity, but it doesn't seem so at the moment indeed Thanks, -- Matt
